That's some really "hard" water
A mother is suing a hotel claiming her teenage daughter fell pregnant simply from using a hotel swimming pool.(h/t reader scott)
Magdalena Kwiatkowska says the 13-year-old conceived after coming into contact with 'stray sperm' in the water of an Egyptian resort.
The Polish tourist board has confirmed they have received a complaint from Mrs Kwiatkowska.
**********
RELATED: Speaking of teenage girls...
And while we're on disturbing images...
**********FROM THE COMMENTS: Leave my President alone!
**********LAST WORD: Alrighty... problem solved
Coming up on "President McDreamy saves the World"... Episode XIV: Robert Mugabe gets a "stern talking to".*
49 comments:
Out of thousands of gallons of water that mighty little swimmer found the 13year old....what the heck is wrong with this crazy mother. The pool water circulates 3 or 4 times daily depending on the amount of water...it is also treated with chlorine or salt to keep down bacteria. If that sperm survived all that it should be in the Guiness Book of Records
*
not to mention... unless there's some special new nude swimming pools in egypt... penetrating a bathing suit.
maybe, just maybe... somebody should ask the kid for her version of what happened.
*
Hey, in a religion where you can get KILLED for getting to first base, I wouldn't be surprised that the kid swears to her dying day that "No, I would NEVER do anything like that" (much like another famous "virgin birth").
It's Michael Jackson's ghost that did it...if not...why not...he could and did everything else befitting a God according to the MSM
*
"anon says... in a religion where you can get KILLED for getting to first base"
i think the girl is actually polish and likely catholic... but what the point here really is... some people are just too stupid to have children.
*
If looks could impregnate that gal Barry is leering at will be the next one in court.
If you pretend hard enough, you might just be able to ignore the egg on your face.
"Derangement syndrome" much?
*
sure thing audrey... obviously president mcdreamy can do no wrong.
hope, change and... "let's scope out the underage nookie".
*
No one suggested that Obama can do no wrong. The issue is that he didn't do the wrong that you accused him of doing.
I guess if you think that sarcasm and strawman slaying will provide a distraction from your feces-flinging error, then good luck with it.
...Now taking wagers on how long Neo will go without recognizing or acknowledging his posting of an outright and demonstrable lie.
*
say, audrey... this isn't the first time you've swung by to defend "the one" against us knuckle-draggin' neocons, is it now?
"OMGZ!!1!! Obama makes a distinction between one nation imposing a system of governance on another and the addressing of the suffering of people. Teh inconsitency iz fettered to teh stinking corpse!!1!1!". --
bit of a crush, huh?
and, oh yeah... who could forget your passionate defense of poor richard raymond babinski.
you can sure pick 'em, aud.
got any more heroes we should know about?
*
Thanks for adding to the strawman body count and illustrating my point!
2 replies now and counting where you've frantically done everything-but address your regurgitation of a demonstrable falsehood simply to try to smear a political opponent. Harper would be proud!
*
"aud screams... a demonstrable falsehood simply to try to smear a political opponent"
of course, aud... because you say so.
*
Did you see the actual footage that led up to the snapshot in question?
If you watch it, it clear that Obama wasn't looking at the young lady's bottom at all. He had turned to help another woman down a step.
Your argument (or lack thereof) doesn't hold any water I'm afraid.
Spot on, Stan.
3 replies now and counting where Neo's frantically done everything-but address his regurgitation of a demonstrable falsehood simply to try to smear a political opponent.
Think he'll manage to get into double digits before he speaks to the matter, or will he just stop responding all together? Post your predictions! Maybe you too can have a position hysterically invented on your behalf and dragged up in a pathetic attempt at distraction!
*
"The ladies doth protest too much, methinks."
*
It seems Neo's grasp of Shakespeare is as tenuous as his grasp of elementary logic, as the allusion doesn't make the remotest bit of sense in this context.
4 replies now and counting where Neo's frantically done everything-but address his regurgitation of a demonstrable falsehood simply to try to smear a political opponent.
How will it all end? Will Neo have the intellectual honesty to acknowledge that he posted an opportunistic lie? Will he continue to desperately grasp at straws for a distraction? Will he simply fall silent? Stay tuned!
*
ah, aud... the triumph of hope over experience.
i guess you haven't actually noticed that you comprise a full third of the comments here so far.
and now, i just can't get rid of this picture in my head... of you in your favourite che t-shirt heckling the neighbours over the garden fence.
but, hey... by all means keep rushing back here to pronounce how wrongheaded and... more to the point... how insignificant i am to your life and worldview.
you guys just crack me up.
*
5 replies and counting. Maybe swatting at the Che-garbed demons in Neo's mind will prove a more effective distraction than the multiple straw-stuffed shirts he's already taken on in this thread.
More likely, discerning readers will be quite aware that Neo's still desperately trying to do anything to distract from his unwillingness/inability to address his opportunistic posting of an outright lie.
Good luck with that, and please... post your bets on how it will play out!
*
oh, auddie... "beat me, whip me... make me write hot cheques".
*
Seriously neo, your responses to the OddreyII characters are funny as hell...I don't know if i should thank you for the comedic relief or Oddrey for sticking her nose in and bringin' it on...anywhoo thanks...heh heh.
*
well, mahmood... i have to confess i just don't "get" people like ol' aud.
she showed up here a while back... to defend torture-murderer richard raymond babinski... and i confess it just knocked me on my ass.
she's sorta like the aclu on pcp.
but that just how liberals roll, isn't it?
*
Whether the One did or did not do something isn't the point.
The point is: how many photos that made Shrub look stupid were taken out of context? Aud? Any idea?
Or is your super analytical skill applied only to defending the One?
I like that. A full-throated Straussian defense of "noble lies". Nice crowd you've got here, Neo. I guess that's why you can post without hesitation thinks like the original falsehood and your subsequent "defense of Babinski" strawman: You've got an audience that not only swallows lies, but actively defends the telling of them.
6, & 7, and counting. Much thanks for the ongoing illustrations of my original point. Hell, maybe you can even break double digits!
*
yes, yes, audrey... of course.
thank goodness there are selfless, compassionate freedom-fighters like yourself... who can take up the cudgel against the evil, knuckle-draggin' forces of darkness.
you know... like yourself and, well... bobby day.
"kumbayah, my lord... kumbayah"
*
What on earth are you talking about? "The forces of darkness"? Bob Day? Kumbayah?
Try "one rabid, hyper-partisan blogger so eager to make a hit that he's not only posted an outright lie, but refused over the course of 8+ replies to retract or address his dishonesty after he's been caught". ...Or continue with the strawman massacre. I'm more than happy to continue to draw attention to this circus act of yours for as long as you decide to draw it out. It's been as entertaining as it has been telling.
*
"aud announces... I'm more than happy to continue to draw attention to this circus act of yours"
c'mon now, girl... don't you mean my "full-throated Straussian defense of 'noble lies'", er... circus?
i have to apologise if my lowbrow references don't quite measure up to your standards, aud.
but keep on poundin' girl... you never know when you might actually "edumacate" some of us troglodytes.
p.s. auddie... whaddya think president mcdreamy was kickin' around there with ol' muammar gaddafi... maybe a little "hope & change"?
just askin'.
*
I have to ask why you don't simply respond directly to Audrey. Rather than all the linguistic mumble jumble, which you don't do very well, simply admit the truth. The photo of Obama is a hoax. What have you got to lose? The truth shall set you free.
If you're planning some long-winded response to my comments, save yourself the effort. I won't be back to read it. Nothing more despicable than a man without honor. I think you should also know that I'm a card-carrying member of the CPoC so any cries of " leftard, moonbat etc." don't ring true. I choose to leave this comment anonymously.You have given me that option. Surely I can't be chastised for playing within the rules set out by the blog master?
*
"another anonymous troll says... I think you should also know that I'm a card-carrying member of the CPoC"
yup... and i'm a flying wallenda.
*
Oh come now Audrey. These guys are wacking off silly over the prez looking at 17 year old ass (there, there's some google tags to help the appropriate traffic here...)
There'll be plenty of snapshots from all kinds of angles for these righteous right moral police brigadiers to get all huffy about in future.
It's all they got right now. Well ok, they gots caribou barbie too.
lol.
*
yeah, auddie... you could skate with skinny on this one.
so what if president mcdreamy is scoping out "17 year old ass".
hell... it's not like there were any cigars involved... this time... right?
and "wacking off", huh skins? is that the first thing that came to mind here? you're a naughty boy.
*
11 and counting. Ironically (given the graphic you've now edited into the original post), that's more replies than even I've contributed on the subject. Best of luck with your whole "Lookit how many times Audrey has pointed it out" routine. Maybe no one will notice how many replies you've made in an attempt to avoid/distract from the matter of accuracy.
Even your own commenters have taken notice of your lack of intellectual integrity and stubborn unwillingness to acknowledge the posting of an outright falsehood when called on it.
Congrats on breaking double digits and settling the question of whether or not you've the honesty to admit/acknowledge error.
*
geez auddie... could you maybe say that again?
maybe we'll all understand if you repeat yourself one more time.
*
Your mistake Audrey, is taking this nincompoop seriously. It's too stupid to see that I'm mocking it.
Let them titillate themselves. We know it's bullshit, but those righteous moral nazis need -something- to get off on.
Like I said, what else have they got?
oh and neo, you're so weak. When I see nincompoops freaking out about something so clearly idiotic and childish, of course I think you're a flipping wanker.
You freak out about this childish nonsense, yet, a quick search of your site for say, -real- sex scandals, like, republican Mark Sanford, Matthew Joseph Elliott, former aide to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, was convicted of sexual exploitation of a child (!), Robert McKee (another child pornographer!), and let's not forget republican senator Robert "Bob" Allen who was arrested for solicitation in a men's bathroom! All in the last 2 years, a small sampling too!
None appear anywhere in your blog.
So yea. Excuse me, if I think you're a complete nincompoop, and a wanker.
*
"skinny says... you're so weak... nincompoops freaking out... clearly idiotic... childish... flipping wanker."
ah, yes... the inevitable "you're a big poopyhead" defense.
skinny rulz!
*
Actually, the point that Skinny raised (like others in this thread) is that you've not only posted something that's factually inaccurate, but refused repeatedly to address that.
"Poopyhead" mere was icing on a multiple-reply cake that you yourself not only constructed, but have ironically been the single largest contributor to. Cheers to still grasping (11 replies now?) at whatever straws you can to distract from that.
"ah, yes... the inevitable "you're a big poopyhead" defense."
Well. I suppose the fact that, that's all you took out of my comment, speaks for itself, right here, in black and white.
What could one say to that. Nothing I suppose eh!
Cheers.
*
"auddie explains... 'Poopyhead' mere(sic) was icing on a multiple-reply cake"
more like the thin gruel of desperation... but please... don't stop now.
c'mon guys... your president needs you.
*
"my" president? Well I live in Toronto, so I don't really care too too deeply now. I know I know, enough to comment on your blog about it blah blah... don't get your conservatives shorts in knot now.
However, given the crowd you've chosen to run with, and their track record, I'd say be careful about having a few too many and passing ut at one of -those- partys there neo ...
lol.
*
"skinny lols.. passing ut"
hmmm... is that anything like "passing gas"?
*
Nice unbiased source there Skinny.
If you read/post among the "Kos"sacks, we have every right to say that Obama is YOUR President.
I love how a link to an article detailing Obama's address to Ghana's parliament somehow "solves the problem" of Neo's posting of an outright falsehood and his subsequent double-digit and pathetically transparent efforts at distracting from it.
Will his next red-herring be more or less shamless? Place your bets!
*
"auddie wants to know... Will his next red-herring be more or less shamless?"
shamless... absolutely!!!
i guess that's why you just can't stay away.
*
I'm betting Audii is coming back at least two more times...c'mon Audie.
*
"you can check out any time you like... but... you can never leave"
*
So now it becomes clear, why you complain about people coming in here and dropping annon comment bombs.
You invite them, and seem to like them.
This thread tells the whole story. I expect, you'll come up with some other childish I know you are... BS. "he's one of those 'lefties! That's what it is!
True brilliance.
No wonder people mock you here, and elsewhere.
*
ah, skinny... by people, i guess you mean you and aud, huh?
you'd think maybe stone o-bots like yourselves would just say... "that neo, he's simply delusional about 'dear leader' and his sacred agenda"... and steer clear of an evil philistine like me.
but apparently... you can't.
stay away, that is.
thanks for playing.
*
ah come on you lot - what's wrong with a photo of Obama being a bit cheeky? Harmless fun, surely...?
*
"josh says... a photo of Obama being a bit cheeky"
well, josh... if you've got any acquaintances with teenage daughters... perhaps you could ask them.
*
Post a Comment