07 November 2008

From that "Let the healing begin" file

Noted compassionate, progressive, politically-correct sparrow-fart Dainty Dawg channels Vlad the Impaler...

"Frankly, if I'd been one of those yellow folks who dragged him from the lake where he'd landed, I'd have shot him on the spot."
C'mon Dawg, 'fess up... you'd have tortured him a little first.

*


17 comments:

Anonymous said...

And left-tards like Dawg muse aloud if McCain was even tortured. I guess McCain was faking those injuries for the last three decades. These lefties will go to the wall for Maher Arar and his claims of torture, but then question McCain for is.

Once again, the left demonstrates how disgustingly hypocritical it always has been, and always will be.

Anonymous said...

The "hypocrisy" of the left is barely noticeable, since the view of it is completely blocked by the huge array of straw men trotted out every day by the right.

Such as anon 2:21 claiming that McCain's war wounds are questioned. I've never seen that. As usual, the point about McCain was not a matter of believing his war stories, it was that being a POW does not automatically qualify one for President.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"anon says... the point about McCain"

that's funny, nonny... you just glossed over the whole thing about "dainty dawg" SHOOTING MCCAIN... in his words, "on the spot"... which presumably means, as mccain lay there suffering injuries from the crash of his jet.

can you imagine the fuss if one of the blogging tories wrote about shooting saint barack?

no double-standard here, huh? hypocrisy just doesn't begin to cover it.

*

langmann said...

Hmm. By Dawg's logic we should drag Dawg out to the range and shoot him on the spot. After all he stands for stealing money and property from most of us, doesn't care if our loved ones are raped or killed by criminals, and wants to take away our freedoms.

But we won't even advocate it because, unlike Dawg's communist friends, we believe in free speech and democratic process.

In fact we'll protect his sorry hide, like we have before, when they come for him.

McCain may be a rich boy, he may be a mediocre politician, he may even be the ultimate loser. However one thing is for certain, he didn't ditch his friends on prinicple, when tortured beyond anything anyone can understand. And that takes courage.

The thing about Vietnam that gets lost everytime the left tries to justify their support for some ways but not wars against communism or dictators, is that there were a large number of Vietnamese fighting against the Communist brainwashers, for a good reason which became clear and evident after Vietnam fell, and alternatively may not have been such a disaster if the US had not supported a miserable dictator.

langmann said...

(above should read : some wars , not some ways)

Anonymous said...

No, I didn't "gloss over" dawg's comment, since I couldn't read it, except for your excerpt, which was not clear. Looks like he was pointing out that North Vietnamese might shoot prisoners on the spot. But who knows what the context was?

I was responding to anon 2:21 going into a typical "the left are disgusting" rant claiming McCain's service record is disputed. Something I have not seen. But making up such "left are so disgusting" examples is something I see a lot. Especially here. I see langmann is doing the same. Now we're supposed to believe the "left" all support communist dictators? No. I know it is important to you to marginalize anyone left of Atilla the Hun by claiming they support communist dictators, but it is difficult for you, since it simply is not true.


I won't follow the link to read this alleged Dawg comment. Nice try, but I'm not going to a track 'n stalk site like "ghostofaflea".
For one thing, such sites can track people effectively, unlike blogger sites (as you well know, much to your frustration).

Secondly, who knows what sort of commenting system is in place? Some let you seamlessly edit comments so nobody can tell they were edited, unless they had screen shots from before. Who knows what Dawg actually said?

It's not like blogger where your clumsy cut and paste jobs are completely obvious. You could always sock puppet me, as I suspect you have. But if I was commenting under a blogger account, you would be unable to alter my comments. You only have the option to delete or not.

langmann said...

@ nonny: read it all carefully, including Dawg's statement.

What neo said is "Can you imagine if a BT said the same thing about Obama" what Dawg and his gang would have said about that. In fact many BT sites are making statements about how much of a disaster it would be if Obama was assasinated.

And yes I do think the thoughts of many of the Dawg type left are disgusting and ignorant. After all they stand for the waging of class warefare and taking away freedoms. I don't buy into the "they just mean well" thing anymore. The manipulations of the Dwag type left have resulted in disastrous untintended consequences.

Anonymous said...

After all they stand for the waging of class warefare and taking away freedoms.

The commies are all for the "class warfare" rhetoric, though "the left" in general is not, unless you consider having a basic welfare system is class warfare.

Taking away freedoms is something you see on the democracy vs. dictatorship axis. The left vs. right axis is orthogonal to that.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"cc-nonymous says... I won't follow the link to read this alleged Dawg comment."

but, of course, after refusing to admit dawg even made the comment, cc-nonymous goes on to try defend it...

"Looks like he was pointing out that North Vietnamese might shoot prisoners on the spot. But who knows what the context was?"

well, nonny... certainly not you.

and hey... are you saying you didn't leave me these comments?

yup, nonny... you're one class act.

*

Anonymous said...

Why don't you provide a larger except of the alleged dawg comments here? I'd read them. But I would no sooner go to "ghostofaflea" than I would go to SDA.

Put them here, with context, and Dawg might show up and see them too.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"cc-nonymous says... don't you provide a larger except(sic)..."

i guess you mean excerpt, huh?

lemme see... you're always leaving nazi slurs and sexual references (not to mention the latest death threat) in my comments... and now i'm supposed to do your bidding?

nonny... what planet are you from?

go read it... or don't. you're nothing but a source of amusement to me.

*

mahmood said...

"one of those yellow folks"

I've always maintained that the mouth-breathing, paw-dragging runt dawg is a racist...this low-life dawg has more moves than a chicken on ex-lax deflecting and obfuscating his racism over at damianpenny...what a disgusting performance.

Flea said...

My God I am dying here. First of all, according to this anonymous guy - and yes, we all know it is a guy - I am running a "track and stalk" cite. I have no clue what that is supposed to mean but it makes for an SDA comparison and sounds hard-core so I will take it as a compliment.

Second, what this dimwit fails to appreciate is we are quoting a passage from Dawg's on website, not a comment he left at mine. Is there a Hegelian term for transcendent, self-parodying idiocy? I am quite literally at a loss for the appropriate word.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"flea says... Is there a Hegelian term for transcendent, self-parodying idiocy?"

flea... all you have to do here... is consider the source.

trust me... the dim, flickering light... isn't worth the candle.

*

Anonymous said...

My God I am dying here. First of all, according to this anonymous guy - and yes, we all know it is a guy - I am running a "track and stalk" cite. I have no clue what that is supposed to mean but it makes for an SDA comparison and sounds hard-core so I will take it as a compliment.
It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye. If you own your own domain, you can get the access logs. SDA was the first example to come to mind. They say armed societies are much politer societies. Not quite true. They are polite until someone has you in their scope.

Second, what this dimwit fails to appreciate is we are quoting a passage from Dawg's on website, not a comment he left at mine. Is there a Hegelian term for transcendent, self-parodying idiocy? I am quite literally at a loss for the appropriate word.
Well I wouldn't know what you are quoting, since I won't go there, fool. That's why I asked for it to be reproduced here. Nice try putting out the bait, but yer not getting my IP chum.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"cc-nonymous whispers... yer not getting my IP"

you just don't get it, do you nonny?

you're not deep-throat, you dumbstick... you're a mosquito with a persecution complex.

let's take it easy on the troll, you guys... he's so freaked out, he actually forgot his everpresent laugh track.

*

mahmood said...

There you go again, posting that inkblot head, cue the boy's laughtrack...hahahahaha...that pic gets me everytime but really on a Sunday morning neo?...I've got this image of the boy zipping around on his bicycle(training wheels attached)and the inkblot bobblehead bobbling thru the streets of Waterloo...what a sight, I'm sure.