07 January 2017

Whoever exposed DNC corruption...

...be it hackers, a state actor or some random whistleblower... they deserve a medal.

Instead... Canada's national broadcaster yet again, like their MSM sisters-in-sin, is out whoring for the criminal, lunatic left.insert alt text hereHere comes the CBC... at its Boogeyman best.

Putin and the Russian government aspired to help president-elect Trump's election chances when possible by discrediting secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavourably to him."

The release of the emails led to embarrassing media coverage for Clinton and triggered the resignation of the DNC's chief.
What was discreditable here was the conduct of Hillary Clinton and the DNC. Paying agitators to provoke violence at Trump rallies. Taking secret debate questions from news organisations. Covering up Hillary Clinton's obvious physical disability. The DNC sabotaging Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders. The list goes on.

And the CBC thinks the offense was bringing all these activities to the public's attention?

(nb. image borrowed from maggies farm)


RELATED: Let's pull this apart...insert alt text here
The administration also did not mention that the election hacking occurred largely because of Podesta’s own carelessness in using his security password. Moreover, it failed to acknowledge that the Republican National Committee was likewise targeted, but apparently had enough safeguards to prevent successful entry into its records.

Finally, the administration refused to mention that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange went on the record saying that he did not receive the email trove from the Russians.
Read it all.


LAST WORD: A lame duck's last quack
The absence of any concrete evidence in the report of meddling by the Kremlin was met with a storm of mockery on Saturday by Russian politicians and commentators, who took to social media to ridicule the report as a potpourri of baseless conjecture.

The report provides no new evidence to support assertions that Moscow meddled covertly through hacking and other actions.
No, not Pravda... this is the New York Times.


Bill E said...

This (and the CBC) epitomise "fake news" - this propaganda piece is raw steaming BS on so many levels it's astounding there are morons who will eat as much as CBC can dish out.

First the alleged report was a report on a report of an allegation - to date no evidence links the Russians to the hack and certainly none to Putin directly - this is pure uninvestigated, unconfirmed, concocted BS the CBC regurgitated from a Soros foundation memo/press release.

Secondly, it is illogical to blame the wiki-leaked emails when they were A) genuine and B) contained open confirmation of Clinton/DNC criminality and C) they came from a server Clinton was illegally running in her home.

Yup, this is all the great Trump-Putin conspiracy - the CBC and the demented left go full tinfoil hat batshit crazy conspiracy theory mongoloids - eating up fake news as fast as the CBC can dish it.

This is why I'm leaning toward voting for Kelly Leich, she will end this fake news outlet gorging itself on tax dollars.

Neo Conservative said...

"bill e says... why I'm leaning toward voting for Kelly Leitch"

moi aussi.


Anonymous said...

Why would the Russians want to help Trump?