17 November 2010

Ex-movie star & ex-Ignatieff BFF...

...takes aim at federal Cabinet Ministers...

Dhalla said she also took offence to the defence department advertising on websites that promote violence, such as hockeyfights.com.

"The buck stops obviously with the ministers, whether they have contracted those (the advertising) out, the buck stops with the…government."

“I don’t think that any Canadian out there wants to have these types of keywords or websites identified which are objectifying and insulting and demeaning to women.”
So, Ruby.... you're all about respecting women?

'Cos I'm thinkin' there's a "Hooters" out there that had to go on a manic hiring spree.
feminism first
Why? And for Whom? -- is a six-year-old Hindi film that tells of a man poisoning his wife to collect insurance.
Let's not even get started on "Canadian values"... like, say... pensions for recent immigrants or indentured servitude.


7 comments:

Pissedoff said...

Considering how much the libs stole from Canadian taxpayers with adscam and have not paid back, she shouldn't even mention the word advertising.

Neo Conservative said...

*
i take your point, but I'm not sure that logic or coherence has anything to do with the lunatic left-o-sphere.

for instance, my buddy nonny-mouse (thank you comment moderation) just can't seem to stop himself from constantly lol'ing & hahaha'ing... about how i must be having a sweaty fling with sarah palin.

i must have killed a dozen nonsensical rants in the last 24 hours... but he just keeps coming.

seems i'm still way more important to him... than he will ever be to me... or maybe he's just too cheap to pay for actual phone sex.

sad really.

*

Kaffir_Kanuck said...

"Dhalla said she also took offence to the defence department advertising on websites that promote violence, such as hockeyfights.com."

I can't seem to find the reference and I've been to the site and have seen no advertisement from DND.

I'm all about picking on the Libs for their idiotic behaviour, and picking on someone else other than McCallum and Iffy would be entertaining. Do you have the link ref her offence to the CF's advertising?

Neo Conservative said...

*
"kk asks Do you have the link ref her offence to the CF's advertising?"

sorry... you have what i have.

for further details, might i suggest you email the author of this article... sun reporter althia raj, at althia.raj@sunmedia.ca.

*

JA Goneaux said...

Funny, isn't it, that when an totally randomly placed Google ad pops up on a leftist's blog, the excuse is "I have no control over the placing of ads".

But now, apparently, Harper is supposed to take on The Google?

In the article today, Her Bollyness was going on about how Canada Post and the National Film Board, which the left tells us are "arms length" agencies, are being naughty-naughty.

I'm sorry, Neo: I haven't had my full Tims yet...what am I thinking? Consistency in Liberal "thinking"?

Never mind...

Taylor said...

There's a big difference between a woman being in a film and the conservative government posting ads on websties that have child porn, how can you support that?

Neo Conservative said...

*
"taylor shrieks... the conservative government posting ads on websties that have child porn"

and, taylor... you have the url for even one instance of that?

yeah... that's what i thought.

*