28 November 2016

Since this is addressed to liberals...

...spare me the usual nonsense about “Victim Blaming”. We don’t have time for silliness. If you’re banking on the goodwill of evil people to keep you safe, you are a sucker.

If I urge you to look both ways before crossing the street, I’m not victim blaming, I’m trying to keep your stupid ass from getting hit by a bus.

Unarmed self-defense is great, when it works. I’m a fan. Less-lethal devices like pepper spray are great, when they work.

But trust me on this, everybody who does this professionally, who has spent years learning about how violence really works, we all have guns.

I know many of you are scared of guns, but just think of them like fire extinguishers, but for (putting out) murderers.
**********

RELATED:
Shoot/no shoot
Here is another article where I go into a great deal of detail about when it is legal to shoot somebody. Trust me, I know more about this than the staff writers at Salon.

If somebody dressed entirely in Confederate flags walks up, screams DIE GAY ABORTION VEGAN and tries to stab you with his commemorative Heinrich Himmler SS dagger, it’s game on
**********

UPDATE: Oh look... those evil guns...

...actually saved lives again today...
The man suspected in an attack at Ohio State University today has been identified as Abdul Razak Ali Artan, according to law enforcement officials. School officials said this morning's attack on the OSU campus began when the assailant drove a vehicle into several people, then exited the vehicle and began slashing at them with a knife.

A police officer near the scene responded almost immediately, shooting and killing the attacker within about a minute of the beginning of the attack.

Just three months ago an OSU student named Abdul Razak Artan was quoted in OSU's college newspaper, The Lantern, as he discussed his troubles finding a place to pray on his new campus.
Thus endeth the lesson.


4 comments:

Anonymous said...

old white guy says.............the government/law rejects the defence of our lives because if we do kill an attacker they will charge us for using excess force, even if the criminal is in your house and a threat to you and your family. Canada will not be a very safe place in the not to distant future as we are importing thousands of Islamic jihadis. That aside, just look at the ongoing activity in what is the jane/Finch area, the violence is ongoing and has spread.

Neo Conservative said...

*
there will be an inevitable breakdown in social controls. the usa under barack hussein osama hasn't been so racially divided since the civil war. the government has been stockpiling supplies and conducting civil uprising drills over obama's last term.

remember los angeles after rodney king? ferguson? the assassination of police officers in texas?

will it happen here too?

i'm not interested in the speculation as much as i am in being ready for it.

my philosophy has simply become... "not me, not mine... not today."

*

Bill E said...


This armed self defense instructor makes many valid tactical points and considerations that Col. Cooper would not. Cooper was primarily focused on having you survive a gun fight with a goblin. This guy is also interested in having you survive the court ordeal of having to defend your right to life by taking another.

Where this breaks down is in Canadian law ( what I consider to be a mutant mish mash of deviant ideology and authoritraianism which has strayed so far from it's egalitarian roots of justice that it is acrually a pervasive malignant force in our society)

- Americans have far more legal rights to self defense than we do - regardless of of the minor tweaks Harper did to self defense, essentially you will confront the aggressive hostility of an authoritarian leftist police state when you defend your action of self-actuated defense of life - they view every self defense case as an opportunity to "send a message" to any other servile plebs who may get uppity and decide their life is more important than the state dictat to become a statistc in order to continue the fraudulent Utopian narratives which shield authorities from responsibility or liability for your life.

Unlike many places in the US Canadian police are not liable for your life, they are armed to defend themselves, not you, and even if in the unlikely event they are at hand when the lethal threat to you occurs. When I saw this come out in self defense trial transcripts it changed my way of thinking.

Essentially such a government and justice system, which claims a monopoly on the use of lethal force and is not liable for your safety, yet deny you the right to defend yourself with lethal force is necessary in their absence, is immoral.

This is the cluster fvck if unjust immoral judicial tyranny we kive under - God knows how many unarmed innocents have dies hre to preerve this self destructive utopian concept of "only police should have/use guns", all I know id there is now ZERO trust in the motives of government, police and judicial motives, if they feel my life is so expendable it can be wasted on a bonfire of political vanity.

As Canadian society/culture continues to deteriorate and violent crime in metro areas expands an open honest discussion about armed self defense has to happen here - we see the world over that gun free zones (where responsible citizens are forbidden to access or use firearms for defense of life) are becoming literal grave yards of innocent victims of the savages who do not obey gun free zone laws.

Neo Conservative said...

*
fwiw... i've only put up one post today because i had to visit the devil's armpit to pick up one of the tools of liberty & freedom.

*