17 August 2008

I defy you to tell me...

...where the Taliban leaves off... and the Toronto Star starts in...

“The Canadian people have to realize if their sisters, their brothers, and their children are being killed in Afghanistan, it is because of the wrong policy of the government of Canada and their falling under the influence of others when they sent occupation soldiers to Afghanistan,” said the letter.
I guess, after butchering a couple of unarmed Canadian social workers, these guys are feelin' they're really hot shit.
“Therefore, you have to convince your government to put an end to the occupation of Afghanistan, so that the Afghans are not killed with your hands and so that you are not killed with the hands of the Afghans.”
*


22 comments:

Anonymous said...

You can tell the taliban have a subscription to the Toronto Star.

Someone should inform them that there are only a very few here in Canada who are cowards, and the left-lib socialist parties are losing political clout faster than you can say 'taliban jack is an idiot.'

Someone should explain to the taliban that men in Canada, are men, not cowards.

Someone should explain to the taliban, that unlike them, in Canada our men value their women and children, feel an innate urge to protect them.

Unlike the taliban our Canadian soldiers do not hide behind women and children to fight.

Our soldiers have a secret weapon, one that an islamist could never understand.

Our soldiers are human, and the taliban are animals. Our soldiers will hunt them down and kill them, there will be no mercy.

Rose said...

Once I read the word "Occupation" I tuned out, a flaky tin foiler that hasn't got a clue what they are blathering on about.

That a girl Honey Pot, smack on.

Anonymous said...

like one commentator said, when we capture those Taliban scum instead of giving them prayer matts facing Mecca we should make them wear pink panties and eat pork three times a day.

s said...

I suppose you disagree with the opinion the the west's strategy is not working. Perhaps you could explain how it is working, considering that the west has been in Afghanistan for six years and the Taliban are still operating with relative impunity.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"s says... the Taliban are still operating with relative impunity"

well... they're certainly dominating any unarmed female aid workers they come up against.

every time these donkeyheads stand and fight they get pounded into applesauce. that's why they lay boobytraps and skedaddle.

so much for operating with impunity.

hey, s... maybe instead of setting up a dummy profile for the sole purpose of trolling conservative blogs... you could start up your own and then share your expert opinions.

*

s said...

"every time these donkeyheads stand and fight they get pounded into applesauce. that's why they lay boobytraps and skedaddle."

Umm, yeah...except for the last two Canadian soldiers, who were killed in firefights.

Anyway, nice try at not answering the question: explain how the west's strategy is working? Why is opium production going up? etc.

Anonymous said...

I say pull all the aid workers out, or arm them to the teeth, go in and ferret the evil bastards out. Train armies of dogs to help hunt them down in their caves. Teach the dogs to rip them apart when they find them in their holes.

No one from the civilized world should be in that shithole unless they have the ability to put a gun in a taliban scum's mouth and blow the back of its head off.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"s says...except for the last two Canadian soldiers, who were killed in firefights."

ah yes... s is my latest incarnation of anonymous troll. he's over on another post doing the same thing this morning.

he has set up a profile, not to blog, but to run around causing mischief... by asking his oh-so deep questions.

tell me, s... why would i choose to play your game... when you are so clearly not interested in any type of discussion... instead merely playing lucy warman's game of "maximum disruption."

nice try though. i think this is where you trumpet some sort of victory, right?

sorry... it's getting old already.

*

Anonymous said...

Obviusly the object of terrorism is to 'bend' the 'nation' of target.
Toronto Star is grasping it's ankles.
Did they dare to quote PMSH when he called the wimps cowards?

s...How many terrorists attacks have we had on North American soil since 9/11?
Now go ballistic because I answered a question with a question....

bluetech

s said...

neo asks: "why would i choose to play your game?"

What game? I asked you a simple question...are you afraid to back up your assertion that the west's strategy in Afghanistan is working?

You need to stop being a frightened little troll on your own blog.

anonymous writes: "s...How many terrorists attacks have we had on North American soil since 9/11?"

Since you like answering questions with questions, here's one for you: How many terrorist attacks did we have on North American soil before 9/11?

Neo Conservative said...

*
"s asks... What game?"

of course... you're just here to discuss the issues, huh?

lemme see...

"you're a scared, angry man...who is fucking NUTS!"
Posted by s to halls of macadamia at 10:23 AM, August 06, 2008


sorry, troll... no sale.

*

s said...

Still crying over the "nuts" comment? You try to conflate the number of people dying in a stampede in India to Taser deaths in Canada, then you get indignant because the stupidity of this comparison is pointed out to you. neo...seriously...you are NUTS! And this is just a very minor example.

Why do you bother having a comments section? Anytime someone disagrees with you, you label them a troll, call them childish names and change the subject. If you're not going to answer questions, you might as well be like Shaidle and accept no comments. It would save you the trouble of trolling on your own blog.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"s shrieks... seriously...you are NUTS!"

well, troll-boy... if you came to my house and behaved this badly, i would very quickly show you the door.

why should you get a pass here?

here's a thought... get your own blog and actually put yourself out there... instead of just childishly sniping from the sidelines.

yeah, sure... that'll happen.

*

frank said...

Neo,

I think it's time to do the left way. Pull ALL the troops out now and then send Jack Layton and any other ndp and/or ndp supporter over to Afghanistan to negotiate with the taliban. Heck, I would even donate some cash to help buy their plane tickets. So what do you say "s", are YOU willing to head over there with Jack and negotiate with the taliban? Oh but before you go lets pull ALL the troops out of there first so there isn't anymore bloodshed.

s said...

neo, you still don't get it, do you? You're not making a fool of yourself in your house...you're making a fool of yourself in public. You're the crazy old guy, standing on the street corner, shaking his fist and yelling at people walking by. I'm here to point out your foolishness. And the fact you won't answer a straight forward question.

frank, Karzai also wants to negotiate with the Taliban. But what does he know? Anyway, back to the original question: explain how the west's strategy in Afghanistan is working?

Neo Conservative said...

*
"s pleads to be heard... shaking his fist and yelling at people walking by"

oh, doctor s, i misunderstood... i should have seen you're here to save me...

"you're a scared, angry man...who is fucking NUTS!"
Posted by s to halls of macadamia at 10:23 AM, August 06, 2008


and here i've been thinking you're just some stubborn, pinko troll.

hey... you take your song & dance over to rabble, or canadian cynic... i'll bet they lick you up one side and down the other.

i mean, you're obviously some sort of genius, right?

*

s said...

I'm here to mock you, not to save you...btw, you still haven't answered the question. Aren't you man enough?

Anonymous said...

Mostly Water has a "Response" to the Taliban Open letter:

http://mostlywater.org/a_response_open_letter_afghan_resistance_canadian_people

Neo Conservative said...

*
"s says... I'm here to mock you"

hmmmm... you better step it up then, my yappy friend. so far, you've just managed to embarrass yourself.

hey, does that "nyah, nyah, are you man enough" stuff actually work on anybody over the age of fifteen?

*

Neo Conservative said...

*
"anon says... Mostly Water..."

hey, s... you could visit "mostly water"... she'll love you long time.

*

frank said...

s, are you trying to tell us that Afghanistan was better off with the taliban in power? Perhaps what you really mean is the west should have continued to ignore them like the Clinton administration did.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"Bin Laden's main goal is to bring about regime change in the Middle East and to replace the governments in Cairo and Riyadh with Taliban-style theocracies."

"He believes that the way to accomplish this is to attack the "far enemy" (the United States), then watch as the supposedly impious, U.S.-backed Muslim regimes he calls the "near enemy" crumble."

"In fact, bin Laden's plan resulted in the direct opposite of a U.S. withdrawal from the Middle East.

The United States now occupies Iraq, and NATO soldiers patrol the streets of Kandahar, the old defacto capital of bin Laden's Taliban allies."


*