03 December 2015

Was President Hussein Obama right?

If you believe in "micro-aggressions" & "cultural relativity" why wouldn't serving bacon at a "Christmas Party" be considered "workplace violence?"some meat is murder

Today's killings in San Bernadino, CA took place because a County Employee who was Muslim went berserk over Pork being served at the Christmas Party event!"

"The prohibition of pork in Islam is derived from the following verse of the Qur’an:"

Forbidden to you are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah.”
[Al-Qur'an 5:3]
(For the record, I have no idea what "undead meat" might be... but it sounds a little off-putting... not that I would ever commit mass murder because of it.)

The way the two jihadis were uber-prepared to go to war suggests that they were just looking for the right reason to spring into action.

Local law enforcement reports that they found thousands of rounds of ammunition and a dozen IEDs (and supplies for making more) at the shooters home, which suggests something may have set them off prematurely before they could put together an even deadlier attack.

But what if pork products at the "holiday" dinner were actually the causal event that sparked this mass murder?

If this article is credible does this mean the end of the corner delicatessan as we know it? Will we soon see a ban on pulled pork sandwiches in Lotus Land?

**********

UPDATE: Could it be that simple?

Is the mainstream media just too politically correct to report that all these people died because a devout adherent of the "Religion of Peace" went homicidally ape over bacon rolls?
This certainly makes it seem like there was another – much bigger, more significant – attack planned, and that for some reason Farook lost his shit and decided to shoot up his co-workers in a fit of rage. That also makes it believable that this was a case of premature detonation.
I guess we'll see.


10 comments:

Frances said...

There is also talk on the blogs that our shooter had a run-in with a Jewish colleague a couple of weeks previously; said colleague is among the dead.

Any Jewish folk I have known may not eat pork (though I have occasionally commented on "kosher ham"), but they would not kill should pork be present. This is a totally manufactured excuse for pre-meditated murder.

And, Neo, why should it be the non-Muslims who are expected to change everything so as not to "offend" any Muslim present? Shouldn't Muslims, coming into our culture, at least be prepared to tolerate our ways?

Mr Bear said...

Certainly a credible possibility. And now the beloved PM of Canada has appointed a terrorist supporter of Hamas & Hezbollah as Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Foreign Affairs. It'll get worse before it gets better. You better keep that 1911 clean and lubed.

Anonymous said...

old white guy says..........islam is at war with the world and the world is blind deaf and dumb.

Neo Conservative said...

*
it all seems to come down to "my beads are holier than your beads"...

*

Bill Elder said...

Of course these murderous frenzied outbursts occur regularly when Jews are served pork at social events.

Hey I thought Calif. was a gun free zone? I bet these Jihadis armed up with black guns the hoodie ganstas are running all over the state.

jimhenshaw said...

I find it hard to believe that a guy supposedly outraged by serving Pork was able to work as a restaurant food inspector for five years.

xlanforc said...

The apathy in Canada is worse then any Country in the world. Is it egotism or willful blindness that makes us believe We will be spared from terrorist acts. There was no mention of our acceptance of Sharia Law in the throne speech, however On one occasion in answer to a reporter,Justin stated "Different Cultures require different Laws. " Perhaps some older LIBERALS GOT THROUGH TO HIM. He boasted of meetings in Mosques over a years time; secret meetings as no media or outsiders allowed. Who Knows???

Neo Conservative said...

*
with apologies to mike brewer and tom shipley...

"one swine over the line, sweet jesus,
one swine over the line,
sittin' downtown at a railway station,
one swine over the line."


*

xlanforc said...

OBAMA, JUSTIN, AND THE POLITICAL CORRECT IN BOTH COUNTRIES WILL MAINTAIN THAT JUST BECAUSE THE PERSON WHO CLAIMS THEY ARE COMMITTING MURDER AS A JIHAD TERRORIST, IS ARMED OR BUILDS BOMBS, IS ARMED WITH ASSAULT WEAPONS, HAS A COMPUTER LOADED WITH ISLAMIC HATE ARTICLES OF WESTERN CITIZENS, AND AS THE CASE IN BOSTON AND B C PLANTS BOMBS WITH THE INTENT TO KILL AND MAIME HUNDREDS OF YOUTHFUL INNOCENT PEOPLE, ARE PERSONS ''WE" EXCLUDED, AND NOT TERRORISTS.. THE CBC PERSONNEL ARE NOT TO USE THE TERM TERRORIST IN ANY BROADCAST. THAT SAYS IT ALL. ANDY

Neo Conservative said...

*
"THE CBC PERSONNEL ARE NOT TO USE THE TERM TERRORIST IN ANY BROADCAST."

the whitehouse has done the same thing. obama has gone further and it is actually the evil guns themselves that are to blame.

*