03 December 2015

Was President Hussein Obama right?

If you believe in "micro-aggressions" & "cultural relativity" why wouldn't serving bacon at a "Christmas Party" be considered "workplace violence?"some meat is murder
Today's killings in San Bernadino, CA took place because a County Employee who was Muslim went berserk over Pork being served at the Christmas Party event!"

"The prohibition of pork in Islam is derived from the following verse of the Qur’an:"

Forbidden to you are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah.”
[Al-Qur'an 5:3]
(For the record, I have no idea what "undead meat" might be... but it sounds a little off-putting... not that I would ever commit mass murder because of it.)

The way the two jihadis were uber-prepared to go to war suggests that they were just looking for the right reason to spring into action.

Local law enforcement reports that they found thousands of rounds of ammunition and a dozen IEDs (and supplies for making more) at the shooters home, which suggests something may have set them off prematurely before they could put together an even deadlier attack.

But what if pork products at the "holiday" dinner were actually the causal event that sparked this mass murder?

If this article is credible does this mean the end of the corner delicatessan as we know it? Will we soon see a ban on pulled pork sandwiches in Lotus Land?


UPDATE: Could it be that simple?

Is the mainstream media just too politically correct to report that all these people died because a devout adherent of the "Religion of Peace" went homicidally ape over bacon rolls?
This certainly makes it seem like there was another – much bigger, more significant – attack planned, and that for some reason Farook lost his shit and decided to shoot up his co-workers in a fit of rage. That also makes it believable that this was a case of premature detonation.
I guess we'll see.